Link to What's New This Week Minimal Requirements for CRMJ/SOCA 363

Dear Habermas Logo and Link to Site Index A Justice Site



Minimal Competency

Mirror Sites:
CSUDH - Habermas - UWP - Archives

California State University, Dominguez Hills
University of Wisconsin, Parkside
Soka University Japan - Transcend Art and Peace
Created: August 11, 2003
Latest Update: September 11, 2003

E-Mail Icon jeannecurran@habermas.org
takata@uwp.edu

Index of Topics on Site Minimal Requirements for CRMJ/SOCA 363: Corrections
The following categories and timelines were set up to help guide you through a reasonable scheduling of the course preparations and your measurements of learning. Few of us in today's fast track are reasonable. But having a schedule to react against is sometimes a solace. We have tried to indicate our minimal requirements for passing the course. Getting a B or an A, as in any course, depends on doing exceptional work. Your actual preparations and your grade are up to you. Sometimes it makes more sense to take a B, and live your life more fully. For many of us, these are "the good old days." Our respect for you and your right to answerability does NOT depend on your grade.

There are numerous examples of how to submit and edit your submissions, oral or written, if you want to improve your grade.

Because so much of our work is up online you have more latitude to adapt your learning to your lived experience. That doesn't mean that you should wait until the last week of school to focus on this course. At that point you may not like our answer. Remember, dialog is a two-way or multi-way discourse, not monologic. And if you leave all your work until the last week, you don't leave us much room for answering, and you're not likely to have aesthetically produced a network relationship that you can depend on for support. Worse, such a use of your time would suggest you haven't learned the basic lessons of the course.

Learning/Teaching and the Interrelationship between Theory, Policy, and Practice -- Week 3 and Who Goes to Prison? and Hassine, part 1 -- Week 4

  • Basics

      You should know:

    • about letters of recommendations (i.e., what to include in a letter, what not to include, and why). Be able to tell the difference between a good letter of recommendation and a bad one.
    • how to obtain an excellent letter of recommendation.
    • the interrelationship between theory, policy and practice, and be able to discuss this interrelationship from any starting point.
    • the difference between prisons and jails

      You should be able to:

    • share experiences on both the receiving and providing ends of the letter of recommendation process.
    • bring in a corrections related current event and be able to explain the interrelationship between "theory, policy, practice" with this current event.
    • compare and contrast the Hassine readings with the Haas & Alpert articles.

    Concepts:

      You should know:

    • dog letters
    • gold stars
    • taxonomy of learning
    • affective and cognitive components of learning
    • the interrelationship between "theory, policy, practice"
    • jails and prisons

    People:

      You should recognize the names of:

    • Alfie Kohn
    • Bloom and Krathwohl
    • Jerome Bruner
    • Victor Hassine

    Arguments:

      You should have thought about:

    • how to obtain a good letter of recommendation.
    • why sometimes the interrelationship between "theory, policy, and practice" is out of sync, especially as it relates to corrections.
    • who goes to prison compared to who "belongs" in prison.



Site Copyright: Jeanne Curran and Susan R. Takata and Individual Authors, August 2003.
"Fair use" encouraged.