Link to Archive of Weekly Issues Cultural Studies

Dear Habermas Logo and Link to Site Index A Justice Site



Social Darwinism
Mirror Sites:
CSUDH - Habermas - UWP

California State University, Dominguez Hills
University of Wisconsin, Parkside
Soka University Japan, Transcend Art and Peace
Created: November 9, 2001
Latest Update: November 9, 2001

E-Mail jeannecurran@habermas.org
E-Mail takata@uwp.edu
E-Mail Olivier Urbain, Soka University

The Conflict of Cultures

Journal entry by Tranell Colquitt

Copyright: Jeanne Curran, Susan R. Takata, and Olivier Urbain: November 2001.
and Individual Authors. "Fair Use" encouraged.

Reactions in this file are based on Edward Said's article the Clash of Ignorance and Edward Said's interpretation of Jane Austen's Mansfield Park.

On Friday, November 2, 2001, Tranell Colquitt wrote:

Subject: The Clash Of Ignorance 1 (SOC)

Said stated, "It is my hypothesis that the fundamental source of conflict in this new world will not be primarily ideological or primarily economic. The great divisions among human kind and the dominating source of conflict will be cultural." I agree with him. Ever since Sept 11th cultures seem to have attacked other cultures whether it be verbally or physically. Do you think we will ever recover from this tragedy?

On Friday, November 9, 2001, jeanne responded:

Tranell, good selection of quote from the article. What you need to do now is to build an argument for why you believe Said to be right. The only explanation you've given is that that's the way it's been since September 11.

You need to show by your conclusion that you understand how what Said concludes in the Clash of Ignorance relates to the theoretical concepts we have been studying and discussing in the sociology of law class.

For example, you should explain what you think Said means by that sentence. I had trouble with it. I'm not completely sure I understand how he see the ideological and economic arguments as separate from the cultural argument. Why do you think culture is the most important perspective. Why not democracy and freedom? President Bush keeps reminding us that this war is about freedom. Is freedom culture? Or is it democracy? Or is it access to economic resources?

And if this is a clash of culture, does that mean that the market and the commodification of culture have essentially won? Does our law follow culture? And which law?

Relevant References:
The following references go the to the Metaphorical Society.