A Jeanne Site
California State University, Dominguez Hills
University of Wisconsin, Parkside
Latest update: January 15, 2000
Faculty on the Site.
Since it's an academic dialog we're trying to start, we need to choose any tidbit of information you can give me that gives me a clue to what you're thinking about some of the concepts and issues we're discussing. Because our objective is that we begin talking to each other, it's a good idea to try to find something we can agree on to start with. Hot clue: if I introduce the topic of victimization, it's probably not a good idea to start by telling me that victims deserve what they get. Disagreement is important, and needs to be expressed, but we don't have to draw a line in the sand as we start off.
Some of you express yourselves easily and well. If you have something to say, by all means start with something that matters to you. But if you stare blankly at the e-mail program after typing in Hi, Jeanne! and can't think of another word to say, then we have some suggestions. They come from ways that others have used to start dialogs with us.
Read the assigned material with this list in mind. There's your first bit of dialog.
Give a specific example in 25 words or so. What exactly did you go back to? Was it clearer this time? Was it satisfying to get the concept down more thoroughly? Was it frustrating to have to spend the time? Are you likely to go back more often?
Give a specific example in 25 words or so. What was exciting? Confirming something you sort of knew, but had never thought through? Finding out that there are many sources that you feel comfortable with? Learning to locate sources, and judge them? Feeling more confident about your knowledge? Is this kind of learning something you would like to keep room for in your life? Can you?
Give a specific example in 25 words or so. What's bothering you? Are you seeing a different perspective of the issue? Example in victimology: Are you wondering if the perpetrator is a victim, what about the perpetrator's victim? Are you seeing the problem as located in an individual? Or are you seeing the problem as structural? Big difference. Does the concept or issue we've discussed go counter to teaching you've had all your life? Is this a new way to think about an issue, and do you need to see more perspectives? Can you identify the perspective you'd like to see, or is it just something you "feel"?
Take a look at my attempt to explain what Lessnoff is saying about Habermas' explanation of the difference between his theory of justice and Rawls' and Kant's theories of justice. It took a few more than 25 words. But it's concise. And it makes clear to anyone who reads it that I've thought about it. So it's a good measure of my learning.
Do other phrases come to mind as you think about how to start a conversation on the concepts and issues we're reading about? Send them to me, and I'll add them to the list.