home | about THP | creative writing workshops | recording studio | terlingua house | lincoln street

back to Exhibition Space

 

Monte Schatz
The Evil Djin Dialectic {deus ex machina}
May 25 - June 21, 2002

Essay by Monte Schatz - Mind: The Great Mirror

Vae Victis: Elegies of Ashen Ponds, numbers 1 and 2 (2002)

Vae Victis: Elegies of Ashen Ponds, detail

Cartological Abysm Drawings (2002)

Double Self-Portrait Contemplating Nothingness (1992)

Mind: The Great Mirror

Essay by Monte Schatz

Joseph Beuys, the late German artist, believed that thought itself was sculpture; that everywhere he "thought" was the Academy. Taking his belief deep within myself, I can conclude that we all harbor a phantom art within ourselves. The word "phantom" implies that we may not be aware of what we elusively know...until we force it to the surface of consciousness, where it becomes art.

Beuys, a brilliant and highly influential artist and a great teacher, had been a Nazi Luftwaffe pilot during the darkest period of the 20th century, perhaps in some ways the most extreme era of evil in history. Throughout the extraordinary body of art that he created after the war, he referred continually to the following event: in winter, his plane had crashed, and he was rescued by being wrapped in fat and gray felt, and carried on a snow sled to a farm house where he was nursed back to health. These elements were used throughout his work.

Recent evidence has suggested that he lied about this rescue, and many of his admirers feel betrayed by his self-invented mythology. I disagree. What's important for me is that art was a way for him to atone and make some form of reparation for his Nazi involvement.

I encountered Beuys when he came to America in the early 1970's for a unique performance/exhibit. He never set foot on American soil. He was met at the airport, and taken directly to the Rene Bloch Gallery where he spent three weeks in a cage with a coyote (an American archetype).

I went frequently to the gallery to watch him and speak with him. He was intense, but very likable; he was most definitely a showman of sorts, but also part shaman. I went at first with great malice because of his background with the Nazis. It felt like seeing Mengele in a cage. I reasoned, even as a Christian, on whose authority do I have an obligation to forgive a Nazi? My feeling was, may they ALL burn in hell, in perpetuity.

Nazi Germany calls up these extreme reactions through its utter, incomprehensible evil. It is not simply because genocide was committed that this period was so unique. Historians still struggle with Adolph Hitler.

Lina Wertmueller, the Italian filmmaker, made perhaps the greatest film ever made about the holocaust in the shocking and intense "Seven Beauties". At the beginning of the film, a monologue contains the sentence, "the baby that should be killed in the crib," in an obvious reference to Adolph Hitler. This thought has haunted me for years, because I know that if I could be told with certainty that an infant would grow up to perpetrate the evil Third Reich, I would be capable of killing it without hesitation. I am rattled in knowing that I, a pacifist, could even think such a heinous thought, and in seeing my own potential for evil, given unlikely and extreme circumstances.

The concept of evil is an elusive and far-reaching one, but in reflecting deeply on Beuys' concept of thought as sculpture, I believe that art is to become conscious of the things that we know, but don't know that we know until we search it out of ourselves. In this respect, we "mirror" ourselves, our nakedness exposed in the pursuit of knowledge of self. "Know thyself" is certainly an objective, yet what we call art can never surpass the subjective.

In conclusion, we can only know vague traces of ourselves - like gazing into the night skies of unfathomable galaxies. We are all pieces of matter and time and the metaphysical ether, pieces of space, light years from ultimate knowledge. Now and again we pull fragments from this ether, this abyss. This then becomes what might be called art. All the more difficult to ponder...

Mirroring of Self
Art as Art
Life as Art

I am troubled by the demystification of art in the 20th century, and now. There is a dogma that art has the ability to be only about itself - its objectness suffices. How can this be?

This seems not only improbable, but impossible. Even the contemplation, the notion of "nothingness" has to be contained within "somethingness" to be considered. Nothing of matter, or the immaterial, can ever be independent of the greater whole, in and outside of our minds - the Great Mirror.

But further, to the average person it might seem that nothing can happen in nothing. But to a quantum physicist, nothing is in fact something. Quantum theory holds that probability, not absolutes, rules any physical system. It is impossible even in principle to predict the behavior of a single atom.

If this is true, a work of art is a living molecular entity with uncertain consequences. It could be said to have life, because atoms are present in all things, binding it to a greater whole, a whole where art can once again find its identity.