A Jeanne Site
California State University, Dominguez Hills
University of Wisconsin, Parkside
Latest update: January 8, 1999
Faculty on the Site.
Back to Dear Habermas Home
This is going into DH Column because that's how the issue got here. Snail mail, no less. But remember the principle of access. Not everyone has a computer at home or even available. And the issue is a home-grown crisis - crime reporting and the "disappearing" of the student newspaper at CSUDH over the summer and late Spring. Sources: Feagin, institutional discrimination with no perpretrator. The "no perpetrator" argument is a good one to teach the right's position in conjunction with Minow's unstated assumptions. Some of you may want to add some theory or analysis. Another source will be Goffman's Stigma, because the reporting involved and the disappearing of the paper are visible stigmas. And that leads to what appears to be the throwing out of valid information. The right fails to see the misiformation aspect of the data we are throwing out, so they see it as a freedom of speech issue. Again, no perpetrator. This is gonna take us right into Gordon, Lewis and bad faith.
This needs to be started in the DH Col, but it's got to go on to a complete text on "racing" the baseline of normative system assumptions. Important chunk if we are to achieve discourse.
idncontxt. htm is the other file linked to the current working papers.
Wrote and loaded Villaraigosa piece on raceneth.htm. Linked to L.A. Times. Now need to link to state legislature and to Time-crit.
Found Gaines' Three Men - and put up.
Will put up also Genitrix of Mauriac, but didn't find copy yet. Will put up both French and English. Same with Habermas. Time to put foreign languages on pages. Put up brief essay. Will need copies of book.
Put up amazon.com links to both Gaines and Mauriac, then added internal links to akfiek.htm and fatnmean.htm. Need to add links to race, sex, and ethnicity as those sections are completed.
Find the Virginia Woolf essay on the feminist movement in which she declines to write the feminist story of the working class women, for it is their story and they could tell it far better fhan she, for whom that story does not exist. Quoted in one of our early books.