Mirror Sites:
CSUDH - Habermas - UWP - Archives

California State University, Dominguez Hills
University of Wisconsin, Parkside
Created: January 31, 2002
Latest Update: July 6, 2004
jeannecurran@habermas.org
takata@uwp.edu

Sweatshops, Case at Harvard

Lecture notes: Moral Reasoning 64 from Harvard website.

Facts and fallacies about employment at Harvard On the sweatshop issue.

Pay particular attention to the claims that were made. These are validity claims, folks. This is a lame attempt at discourse over the social issue of sweatshops. We'll want to consider what could have been done that might have been more effective than this cut and dried response. What feeling does this report leave you with? How does this feeling compare with the instructor's lecture from Moral Reasoning 64? See the last half of the file for the Mills' Committee's report. What techniques of attitude change and persuasion are different? How could we transfer what we have learned here to our moot court civil discourse discussions?