Mirror Sites:
CSUDH - Habermas - UWP - Archives
California State University, Dominguez Hills
University of Wisconsin, Parkside
Soka University Japan - Transcend Art and Peace
Created: August 8, 2003
Latest Update: August 10, 2003
jeannecurran@habermas.org
takata@uwp.edu
Syllabus for Soc. 595-01: Alternative Approaches to Theory* * *
Instructor: Jeanne Curran, Ph.D., Esq.
Course: Soc. 595-01: Alternative Approaches to Theory
Office: SBS-B326
Telephone: 310-243-3831
Office Hours: TWTh 1:30 - 2:30 p.m.; evenings, before and after class
Teaching and Research Associate: Patricia Acone, A.B.T.Course Description:
Focus on Bakhtin, Habermas, and Maria Pia Lara, all of whom are concerned with the ethical and moral components of our lifeworlds. Emphasis on Bakhtin's concept of the aesthetic process of answerability and its effect on the creation and development of community, a community of peace and social justice, compared with Habermas' reliance on rationality and the system of justice. Maria Pia Lara addresses similar issues through illocutionary discourse.
Our focus will be on conceptually linking these approaches to contemporary social theory and to current events. Emphasis on understanding the importance of interpretation and re-interpretation in social theory, and on the use of these skills in our lived experiences as a means of building peace and social justice.
Texts:
Required Texts:
- Greg M. Nielsen. The Norms of Answerability: Social Theory Between Bakhtin and Habermas. State University of New York Press. 2002. ISBN: 0-7914-5228-X (pbk). $21.95 new on Amazon.com on August 8, 2003. On order through college bookstore.
- Maria Pia Lara. Moral Textures: Feminist Narratives in the Public Sphere. University of California Press. 1998. ISBN: 0-520-21777-2 (pbk). $21.95 new on Amazon.com on August 8, 2003. On order through college bookstore.
- Dear Habermas Website You can do a Google search of the Dear Habermas site only at this URL. The mirror URLs are in directories and Google does not recognize directories. So use www.habermas.org if you want to do Google search of our site.
Recommended Texts:
- Ann Raimes. Universal Keys for Writers. Houghton Mifflin. 2004. Reference book. Contains sample writings and corrections. Gives detailed advice and samples. Well done. Easy to find stuff. Expensive. Susan said $54 on Amazon.com. Get it only as a reference book. But it looks good as a reference book. Those of you who plan to continue in formal education should consider it. Term papers and theses and dissertations. Remember?
- James Farganis. Readings in Social Theory. McGraw-Hill. 1999. 3d Edition. ISBN: 0072300604 $41.56 new, used from $7.75, on Amazon.com on August 8, 2003. My students in undergraduate theory like this reader. If you need a review text, you might consider it. I did not order this one through bookstore.
Course Objectives:
- Objective:
To master the concept of aesthetic process of answerability and its role in creating an atmosphere of morality and ethics in our institutions and world systems, particularly the educational system. AnswerabilityOutcomes: Students will participate in class discussions on answerability and the aesthetic process of collaborative creation. Students will also choose from these discussiontopics for written discussion that will enhance their skills at translating oral thinking into written documents and serve as one measure of learning for this class. Academic Assessment
- Objective:
To master the concept of monologic non-answerability that is typical of bureaucratization that relies on rules and customs and denies answerability on the part of client or student. Non-AnswerabilityOutcomes: Students will participate in class discussions on monologic non-answerability and the extent to which its presence in an institution harms the climate of learning. Students will also choose from these discussions topics for written discussion that will enhance their skills at translating oral thinking into written documents and serve as one measure of learning for this class. Academic Assessment
- Objective:
To master Maria Pia Lara's definition of illocutionary force as a feminist contribution to balance Habermas' step away from aesthetics in his focus on rationality.Outcome: Students will participate in class discussions on the meaning and application of illocutionary force, comparing Maria Pia Lara's extension of Habermas and Nielsen's extension of Bakhtin. Students will also choose from these discussions topics for written discussion that will enhance their skills at translating oral thinking into written documents and serve as one measure of learning for this class. Academic Assessment
- Objectives:
Students will review classic, modern, and postmodern social theory from which the concepts of aesthetic process of answerability have emerged: Bakhtin, Habermas, Nielsen, Pia Lara, and others, discussing the contributions of many theorists to today's theoretical developments..Outcomes: Students will participate in class discussions on theoretical foundations for present re-interpratations of social theory that lend themselves to peace and social justice. Students may choose measures of learning from these discussions.
- Objective:
Students will apply theoretical discussions to examples within their own institutions and lifeworlds. Focus on conceptually linking social theory to current events and presonal narratives shared in face-to-face and Internet discussions.Outcomes: Class discussions, summaries of which will appear on the Internet, will provide myriad examples for applications. Students will choose an application of specific personal interest and prepare an approach to the application, either for understanding, or in some cases, making it better, using the theoretical tools on which we have focussed. Students may choose measures of learning from these applications.
- Objective:
Towards the end of the semester students will look back on their own class interactions as an example of the creative production of a forum through application of the tools of the aesthetic process of answerability and the understanding of illocutionary force. This evaluation of the class will be initiated in class and internet discussions.Outcomes: Students may choose this evaluative process as a measure of their learning in this class.
Academic Assessment:
- Academic Assessment and Grading Policy
- Minimal Requirements for Passing Grades in Theory 595-01
- Here Be Dragons: The Plagiarism Gotcha Game The university requires inclusion of this component, so it might be a good idea to take a look at it. I stole the title "here be dragons" from a feminist work on the site, but it was more in the spirit of "stealing theory," which is a good thing.
Common Sense:
Permission to enroll in this course is premised on upper division status, rendering you capable of performing competently. However, I recognize that crises occur and that you have many conflicting demands as students, family members, and workers. Please remember that A's are earned, not given for the status characteristic of "being a good student who could get an A if he/she made the effort." One way to deal with such crises effectively is to be sure that I know when they are happening. Because most of my lectures and your practice are on the site, it's easier to make up missed time over conflicts than you might think.
Nota bene: If you have the flu, please don't come and give it to the rest of us. We'll help you catch up when you're well. I lost three weeks to flu a year ago. The bugs are getting stronger and more resistant to medication. If I lose three weeks during classes, you'll be left with a substitute.If you haven't slept, and are falling asleep from exhaustion, please stay home and sleep. Sleep deprivation is a very real problem. We all drive freeways to get here, and go home often late at night. You can kill yourself and others that way. Please don't.
I do not give specific deadlines, because I want you to use your common sense and your own discipline to study effectively. All work can be made up within university imposed limits.
Preparations Schedule for Theory 595-01
- Reading and Discussion Preparations for Theory 595-01 Working copy of schedule below. I reserve the right to adjust the schedule to fit our learning needs. jeanne
- Theory: Minimal Requirements for Weeks 1 and 2 Minimal requirements are just a quick check list for you to determine what we consider absolutely minimal for you to have learned in this course. That means be prepared to assure us that you have learned it. No, we won't give a test. Your job to let us know that you know, in class, by e-mail, in the hallways, etc.
- Minimal Requirements for Textual Readings:
Minimal Requirements for Textual Readings Week Topic Readings 1 Answerability and Academic Assessment Nielsen, Foreword and Intro
Academic Assessment2 Re-Interpreting Sociology through
Aesthetic Process and FeminismPia Lara, Intro
and The Aesthetics of Answerability3 The Normative and
the Non-Rational Moment (The Wolf Man)
and the CreativeJonathan Lear: The Wolf Man
Nielsen, Chapter 14 Feminist Theory and the Construction of Identity Pia Lara, Chapter 1 5 Dialogism and the Other
and a Different Kind of RationalityNielsen, Chapter 2
Pia Lara, Chapter 26 Habermas' Break with the Frankfurt Tradition
and Feminism as an Illocutionary ModelNielsen, Chapter 3
Pia Lara, Chapter 37 Kant as a Source
and Autonomy and AuthenticityNielsen, Chapter 4
Pia Lara, Chapter 48 From Kant to Weber to Bakhtin
and Narrative and the Role of LiteratureNielsen, Chapter 5
Pia Lara, Chapter 59 Mead and Bakhtin
and Women and the Public SphereNielsen, Chapter 6
Pia Lara, Chapter 610 The Nation-State
and Recognition in the Public SphereNielsen, Chapter 7
Pia Lara, Chapter 711 A New Understanding of the Nation?
and MulticulturalismNielsen, Chapter 8 and Conclusion
Pia Lara, Chapter 812 Pulling it all together.
Answerability as a Moral and Illocutionary Forcejeanne and Pat 13 Review, Revise, and Practice
Answerability as a Moral and Illocutionary Forcejeanne and Pat
not available14 Presentations
Answerability as a Moral and Illocutionary ForceOne day for presentations.
Thanksgiving Break15 Presentations
Answerability as a Moral and Illocutionary ForceTwo days for presentations. 16 Exam Week
 
Footnote 1. Esq. means Esquire, and is sometimes used to indicate that you are a member of the Bar.
jeanne is a member of the California Bar. Back to top.