Mirror Sites:
CSUDH - Habermas - UWP - Archives
California State University, Dominguez Hills
University of Wisconsin, Parkside
Soka University Japan - Transcend Art and Peace
Created: February 23, 2004
Latest Update: February 23, 2004
jeannecurran@habermas.org
takata@uwp.edu
SHARING VISUAL SOCIOLOGY WITH THE LOCAL COMMUNITY
Site Copyright: Jeanne Curran and Susan R. Takata and Individual Authors, February 2004.
"Fair use" encouraged.
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 19:07:52 -0500
Sender: IVSA International Visual Sociology Association
From: Judith FriedmanSubject: Jon Wagner comes to Rutgers If you are near Rutgers (NJ), consider coming to a day of Visual Sociology.
Jon Wagner, former president of the International Visual Sociology Assn. and image editor of Contexts Magazine, will give a talk in the Sociology Department Friday, March 5.
Image as Thought and Afterthought:
Reconsidering the Visual Substance of Social ResearchThe talk is in room A256 Lucy Stone Hall at 10 am.
There will be informal conversation early in the afternoon. At 2, Jon will lead a short workshop.
Abstract of talk
Jon Wagner
University of California, DavisWhat's more important to doing good social research, words, numbers or images? Most social researchers would say that it's words and numbers. That's what they are trained to think critically about and to use with care and precision in representing social reality. But the words and numbers used by social researchers are embedded routinely in visual, material artifacts. They're words and numbers that are more visible than not, looked at more than listened to. What questions does that raise about the visual substance of social research? What parallels appear between camera work and photocopying, figures and drawings, theories and pictures? And how do different ways of looking and seeing shape how we think about culture, social organization, and social research itself?
In most accounts of the social sciences, the visual substance of social research is relegated to a small, discrete dimension of social life or linked exclusively to fieldwork with cameras and video recorders. A contrasting image appears if we look closely at how social researchers actually go about their work. They finger keyboards to make letters visible on computer screens. They draw black lines through errant or extraneous phrases on a printed page, or circle numbers in a table of correlations. They take a book off a shelf and thumb through its pages, looking for a familiar passage, a figure that illustrates a concept, or a citation that can identify words written by yet another researcher. Social researchers transcribe audio recordings into visible transcripts and translate personal observations of what they're read in the library or seen in the field into visible and durable notes. They then organize these notes in virtual or material folders that can be hidden or called into view as needed. And while all this is regarded in some quarters as the "life of the mind," the status, their job security and renown depends primarily on that small part of all they think that they can insinuate into artifacts of visible, material culture, research publications and grant proposals in particular.
Paying more attention to the visual substance of their own work might help social researchers improve their craft. That could be worthwhile in and of itself, but an added benefit for scholars - -and for those who read their works - is a deeper understanding of the profound interdependence of the visual, the material and the symbolic in experienced culture and social life.
For information on IVSA and its August 2004 conference in San Francisco: http://wwhw.visualsociology.org --
Judith J. Friedman
Dept. of Sociology
Rutgers University
54 Joyce Kilmer Ave.
Piscataway,NJ 08854
732.247.9791
FAX 732.445.0974