Assessment

COUNCIL ON SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION - FORM AS 4(M) 

 CSUDH MASTER’S SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM 

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES 

 

Form AS 4 for Reaffirmation Self-Study & Candidacy Benchmarks

This form is used to assist the Commission on Accreditation in the evaluation of the program’s compliance with the accreditation standard below:

4.0.3: The program uses Form AS 4(B) and/or Form AS 4(M) to report its most recent assessment outcomes for each program option to constituents and the public on its website and routinely up-dates (minimally every 2 years) its findings.

All programs accredited by the Council on Social Work Education’s (CSWE) Commission on Accreditation (COA) are required to measure and report student learning outcomes.  All students are assessed using a minimum of two measures on their mastery of the nine competencies that comprise the Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards (EPAS) and any additional competencies programs may choose to add.  These holistic competencies reflect the dimensions (knowledge, values, skills, and cognitive & affective processes) of social work practice that all social workers are expected to master during their professional training.  

Programs determine a percentage-based benchmark for each competency and determine an outcome-measure benchmark (minimum score) for each measure. The competency benchmark (which can differ for each competency) represents the minimum percent of students the program expects to have achieved the outcome measure benchmarks in both/all measures for each of the nine competencies. The program then determines the percentage of students that attained each outcome measure (e.g., minimum score or higher), and aggregates the percentages for both/all measures together to obtain the percentage of students demonstrating competence inclusive of two (2) or more measures. The result of aggregating both/all outcome measure percentages provides the percentage of students achieving the competency benchmark. An aggregated percentage at or above the competency benchmark is considered achievement of that competency. If the program has more than one program option, the program must report data for each program option, and also an aggregate of all program options combined to determine an overall percentage of students across all program options achieving the competency benchmark.

Posting Form AS 4 for Ongoing Compliance with AS 4.0.3

Per the requirement of CSWE COA’s recognizing body, the Council on Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA), and accreditation standard 4.0.3, programs must post this form publicly on its website and routinely up-date (minimally every 2 years) its findings.  Upon request, programs must provide CSWE with the weblink to the published form on the program’s website where it is accessible to the public.  Data presented on the form must be collected within 2 years of today’s date at all times.

Summary of the Program’s Assessment Plan | Generalist Practice

Summary of the Program’s Assessment Plan | Generalist Practice

All students are assessed using a minimum of two measures on their mastery of the nine competencies that comprise the Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards of the Council on Social Work Education and any additional competencies programs may choose to add. This summarizes the program's competency-based assessment plan.

Assessment Measure #1: Generalist Field Evaluation

Dimension(s) assessed:

Knowledge, Values, Skills, and Cognitive & affective processes

When/where students are assessed:

Field Seminar; Spring 2021, end of year

Who assessed student competence:

Field Instructor

Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9:

4 out of 5

Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9:

80% of students

Assessment Measure #2: Policy Brief Rubric

Dimension(s) assessed:

Knowledge, Skills, Values

When/where students are assessed:

MSW 511; Spring 2021

Who assessed student competence:

Instructor of Record

Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1, 3, 5, and 9:

4 out of 5

Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1, 3, 5, and 9:

80% of students

Assessment Measure #3: Evidence-based Intervention Plan (EBIP) Rubric

 

Dimension(s) assessed:

Knowledge, Skills

When/where students are assessed:

MSW 521; Spring 2021

Who assessed student competence:

Instructor of Record

Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, and 8:

4 out of 5

Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, and 8:

80% of students

Summary of the Program’s Assessment Plan | Specialized Practice

Summary of the Program’s Assessment Plan | Specialized Practice

Students are assessed using a minimum of two measures on their mastery of the nine competencies that comprise the Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards of the Council on Social Work Education and any additional competencies programs may choose to add, that reflect the area of specialized practice. This summarizes the program's competency-based assessment plan.

Area of Specialized Practice #1: Children, Youth, and Families

Assessment Measure #1: Specialized Field Evaluation - CYF

Dimension(s) assessed:

Knowledge, Values, Skills, and Cognitive & affective processes

When/where students are assessed:

Field Seminar; Spring 2021, end of semester

Who assessed student competence:

Field Instructor

Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9:

4 out of 5

Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9:

80% of students

Assessment Measure #2: Culminating Experience Rubric - CYF

Dimension(s) assessed:

Knowledge, Values, Skills, and Cognitive & affective processes

When/where students are assessed:

MSW 590; Spring 2021, end of semester

Who assessed student competence:

Instructor of Record

Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9:

4 out of 5

Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9:

80% of students

 

Area of Specialized Practice #2: Community Mental Health (CMH)

Assessment Measure #1: Specialized Field Evaluation - CMH

Dimension(s) assessed:

Knowledge, Values, Skills, and Cognitive & affective processes

When/where students are assessed:

Field Seminar; Spring 2021, end of semester

Who assessed student competence:

Field Instructor

Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9:

4 out of 5

Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9:

80% of students

Assessment Measure #2: Culminating Experience Rubric - CMH

Dimension(s) assessed:

Knowledge, Values, Skills, and Cognitive & affective processes

When/where students are assessed:

MSW 590; Spring 2021, end of semester

Who assessed student competence:

Instructor of Record

Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9:

4 out of 5

Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9:

80% of students

 

Area of Specialized Practice #3: Community Capacity Building (CCB)

Assessment Measure #1: Specialized Field Evaluation -CCB

Dimension(s) assessed:

Knowledge, Values, Skills, and Cognitive & affective processes

When/where students are assessed:

Field Seminar; Spring 2021, end of semester

Who assessed student competence:

MSW 590; Field Instructor

Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9:

4 out of 5

Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9:

80% of students

Assessment Measure #2: Culminating Experience Rubric - CCB

Dimension(s) assessed:

Knowledge, Values, Skills, and Cognitive & affective processes

When/where students are assessed:

MSW 590; Spring 2021, end of semester

Who assessed student competence:

Instructor of Record

Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9:

4 out of 5

Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9:

80% of students

 

Assessment Data Collected during the Academic Year 2020-2021

Program: California State University, Dominguez Hills (CSUDH) Master’s Social Work Program 

Directions for completing Form AS 4(M): The competency benchmark is the percent of students the program expects to have achieved both/all outcome measure benchmarks.  Programs calculate the percentage of students achieving each outcome measure benchmark, then calculate the percentage of students achieving each competency inclusive of two or more measures for each program option.  Programs with multiple program options must present data for each program option, and in aggregate inclusive of all program options per competency.  Programs may add/delete columns and to accurately reflect the number of program options offered.  This is a required form.  The assessment data table may be altered to accurately reflect the number of program options offered and additional program-developed competencies. However, beyond these formatting alternations, the program may not alter the content of this form.

 

Assessment Data Collected during the Academic Year 2020-2021

Program: California State University, Dominguez Hills (CSUDH) Master’s Social Work Program 

 

COMPETENCY

COMPETENCY BENCHMARK

(GENERALIST)

COMPETENCY BENCHMARK

(SPECIALIZED PRACTICE)

PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS ACHIEVING BENCHMARK

 

Generalist Practice

Area of Specialized Practice #1

(CYF)

Area of Specialized Practice #2 (CHM)Area of Specialized Practice #3 (CCB)

Competency 1: Demonstrate Ethical and Professional Behavior

 

80%

 

80%

 

93%

 

94%

 

97%

 

100%

Competency 2: Engage Diversity and Difference in Practice

 

80%

 

80%

 

84%

 

93%

 

95%

 

100%

Competency 3: Advance Human Rights and Social, Economic, and Environmental Justice

 

80%

 

80%

 

84%

 

91%

 

91%

 

100%

Competency 4: Engage in Practice-informed Research and Research-informed Practice

 

80%

 

80%

 

72%

 

88%

 

91%

 

100%

Competency 5: Engage in Policy Practice

 

80%

 

80%

 

73%

 

87%

 

84%

 

88%

Competency 6: Engage with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities

 

80%

 

80%

 

88%

 

93%

 

95%

 

100%

Competency 7: Assess Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities

 

80%

 

80%

 

57%

 

94%

 

93%

 

100%

Competency 8: Intervene with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities

 

80%

 

80%

 

86%

 

94%

 

93%

 

100%

Competency 9: Evaluate Practice with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations, and Communities

 

80%

 

80%

 

65%

 

88%

 

88%

 

88%


Note: CYF = Children, Youth, and Families; CMF = Community Mental Health; CCB = Community Capacity Building.